Privatization in Kenya
Country Fact Sheet

Produced by MIGA and the Africa Region of the World Bank – August 2001


Privatization Background

Institutional Framework

Privatization Status

Outlook

More Info

 

FDI Information in IPAnet

 

Doing Business Guides in IPAnet

Relevant Web Sites

 

Kenya Investment Promotion Centre

Map of Kenya

 

For Further Information Contact

Executive Secretariat and Technical Unit (ESTU)

7Th Floor, Anniversary Towers, University Way,

P.O. Box 34542, Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

Source Documents


Privatization Background

Back to the top

In 1994, Kenya started to implement a Parastatal Reform Project. The objective of this project, financed by the World Bank, was to support parastatal reform as a means to reduce the Government’s role in the economy. More specifically, there was three  main components: (i) enhance the efficiency of the public enterprises (PE) sector; (ii) reduce the financial burden of PE on the public sector budget; and (iii) enable PEs to operate on the basis of market principles, promoting operational autonomy, and enhancing accountability.

 

The project included (i) the privatization of at least 20 public enterprises out of the 207 earmarked for divestiture, and the liquidation of uneconomic PEs; (ii) improvement of the efficiency, profitability and accountability of the remaining PEs by phasing out subsidies, establishing an improved corporate governance system, and dealing with excess indebtedness; (iii) adoption and implementation of restructuring plans for five of the largest PEs which included partial privatization; and (iv) improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of the Nairobi Stock Exchange (NSE).

 

During the first phase of the privatization program, the government privatized a large number of small and medium enterprises, but progress in privatizing key utilities and transportation enterprises has been slow. For this reason, the government planned to accelerate the second phase of its privatization program on the basis of a new privatization strategy that emphasizes limiting  the role of government in commercial activities, putting in place an appropriate regulatory framework, and using  competitive bidding and other modalities to ensure transparency and fairness.

Institutional Framework for Privatization

Back to the top

In 1991, the President of Kenya has appointed a high level policy-making body, the Parastatal Reform Programme Committee (PRPC) to supervise and coordinate the parastatal reform program, including privatization. The Executive Secretariat and Technical Unit acts as the Secretariat of PRPC. Kenya has also established the Department of Government Investments and Public Enterprises (DGIPE) within the Ministry of Finance to represent the Government and to oversee the reform process of public enterprises.

 

The World Bank has supported the privatization process in Kenya through the Parastatal Reform and Privatisation TA Credit Program which ended in June 2000.

Privatization Program Status

Back to the top

Among the non-strategic PEs, the Government fully or partially divested or closed 168 enterprises of the original 207 PEs slated  for divestiture. Of these, 54 were divested through preemptive rights; 22 through receiverships; 16 through liquidation; 16 through competitive bidding; 10 through public flotation; one through a management buy-out; and 29 tea factories were sold to tea farmers. Eleven enterprises were partially divested.

 

Progress has been slow with respect to the reform of the core and more strategic PEs, although the completion in 1996 of the Kenya Airways privatization and progress on the privatization of Kenya Telecoms were notable successes on the strategic public front. However, few efficiency improvements have accrued in the railways, ports, power and telecommunications sectors despite the extensive technical work performed and sector reforms made. Because these companies play a significant role in the economy, the lack of progress in privatizing these companies accounts for the limited overall impact of the program on the economy.

 

Indeed, the overall impact of the privatizations was rather modest, at least in relation to the potential. This is because the more ambitious privatization program adopted in 1997/98 is still largely at the level of intentions. Significant but very delayed progress occurred as follows:

 

Kenya Post and Telecommunications Corporation (KPTC). Specific outcomes for the KPTC agenda have been its separation into a telecommunications company (TELKOM), a Postal Corporation (POSTA), and a regulatory body (CCK) is a newly established authority aimed at strengthening the regulatory framework. Because of the importance of the privatization of TELKOM, IDA granted  the Government’s request to extend the project based on a timetable for privatization activities which was to be completed with the sale of Kenya Telecoms, initially by June 2000 and later delayed to December 2000. Preparatory, legal, and investment banking support has been provide by the project. In March 2001, Kenya Telecoms had been well prepared for final sale, and the Government was considering attractive bids for the sale of the company. The project also provided support to the government allowing the development and sale to Vodafone of a second cellular telephone license.

 

Kenya Railways Corporation (KRC). About 10 contracts were let to pursue the privatization of KRC including those focused on preparing for a major downsizing of the company to 14,500 workers. These contracts included a detailed study and cabinet paper on the financial and social costs and possibilities for splitting the railway into freight and passenger services. This included a divestiture study on Gulf Marine Services carried out by Vipul Shipyard Pvt., the company that owned the boats that linked with the railway system and worked on Lake Victoria. In addition, there were several local contracts for the internal reorganization, briefing of staff, development of staff reduction plans and counseling for those who would lose their job. These studies were carried out by the Federation of Kenya Employers; pre-retirement counseling was carried out by a consortium including Kenya Institute of Management, and a management of change workshop was carried out by Manpower Services Ltd. of London. In addition, a contract to undertake locomotive maintenance was let to General electric. A contract to study privatization options was undertaken by CPSC Transcom. This detailed preparatory work, however, did not progress adequately to allow completion of a concession arrangement with a private operator.

 

Kenya Port Authority (KPA). The Parastatal Reform TA project supported development of a performance contract to bring in new private management at the port resulting in a notable increase in the ports throughput. Eventually the managers withdrew at the end of their contract because of difficulties in achieving the level of day-to-day control from Government for management and maintenance which they felt was necessary to implement agreed improvements. The Government did, however, respond by changing the entire Board at the port. Despite tremendous vested interests opposed to privatization of the port/container terminal’s management, financial and operational improvements continued to be achieved as a result of Government’s replacing management on an ad hoc basis. However, there is still need for major investments in the container terminal.

 

National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB). A contract with Agriconsult of Australia was reached. The contract allowed the advisors to sell off the silos and to undertake a retrenchment program which has improved the environment for grain production in the country.

Outlook

Back to the top

The GoK adopted a strategy and policy framework which outlines a clearly defined and time-bound program of privatization focused on the country’s largest and most significant enterprises. The framework includes additional institutional and process features, overcoming weaknesses identified in the first-phase program. Specifically, a centralized institutional framework, led by the minister of finance is empowered to undertake all privatization transactions and to ensure that the privatization policy is enforcer consistently and transparently. A transparent, competitive divestiture process, including an active communications, information, and public relations effort, will be undertaken with respect to principal stakeholders. A privatization fund held by the minister of finance and Planning will be subject to regular audit and reports provided to the cabinet, parliament and any donor depositing monies into the fund. The attorney general has issued a legal opinion confirming the adequacy of the legal and legislative framework to permit  implementation of the privatization program and has indicated that a Privatization Bill is not necessary.

 

The proposed privatization transactions as presented in the Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper are as follows:

 Stage 1 (12-24 months to be completed by FY 2001/2001): (i) completion of the privatization of Telkom Kenya through the sale of 49 percent shareholding to a strategic partner and commercialization of postal services. (ii) Award of a concession for the operation of Kenya Railways through competitive bids to a company jointly owned by  domestic investors and strategic partners. Rolling stock for freight  and passenger services will be transferred to the concessionaire, while all infrastructures will remain under public ownership. (iii) Concessioning of the Container Terminal. The noncore services of the port will be contracted to the private sector for better management and efficiency. Kenya Ports Authority will be converted  into a landlord port. (iv) Full privatization of Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB) by a trade sale of the remaining 35 percent of the government shareholding or part thereof  to a strategic investor. (v) Full privatization of Kenya Reinsurance Company (KCR) through trade sale to a strategic investor and flotation of the remaining shares on the Nairobi Stock Exchange (NSE). (vi) Partial privatization of Mumias Sugar Company and of Chemelil Sugar Company through flotation of shares on the NSE and, if necessary, the sale of a portion of shares to a strategic investor. (vii) Privatization of Agro-Chemical and Food Company Ltd. (ACFC) by modalities that are under studies.

 

Stage 2 (18-36 months) to be completed by FY 2002/03. (i) Privatization of electricity distribution through Kenya Power and Lighting Company. (ii) Partial privatization of Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KENGEN) through an initial public offering. (iii) Partial privatization of Kenya Pipeline Company. (iv) Privatization of Kenya Oil refinery through modalities to be developed. (v) Privatization of Kenya Seed Company through sale of shares to a strategic investor. (vi) Privatization of Kenya National Trading Corporation (KNTC) through liquidation. (vii) Privatization of East African Portland Cement Company through the sale of government shares on the NSE.

 

Sources

Back to the top

 

Implementation Completion Report on a Credit of SDR 16.1 million (US$23.32 million  equivalent) to the Republic of Kenya for a Parastatal Reform Technical Assistance Project, The World Bank, March 2001.

 

Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper -- Kenya, July 13, 2000

 

Kenya Parastatal Reform and Privatisation TA Credit Project, the World Bank, November 1992

 

The World Bank’s Africa Privatization Database.